State ex rel. Schafer v. Buckham
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Certiorari to review an order of the district court for Steele county, Buckham, J., establishing a ditch and directing that it be built. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.
Pursuant to the decision in Heinz v. Buckham, 104 Minn. 389, 116 N. W. 736, petitioners for a ditch to be laid under chapter 448, p. 641, Laws 1907, filed a prayer for a third hearing upon the original petition. These relators thereupon filed objections to such further hearing. The first of those objections which is specifically here involved was as follows: “The ditch as petitioned for embraces only a portion of the drainage basin naturally drained by the Crane creek named in the petition for said ditch, and no more than a portion of the lands which must eventually be drained into and by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Mantorville Railway & Transfer Co. v. Teunis SlingerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- State ex rel. Ross v. PoszSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- County of Lyon v. LienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Webb v. LucasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- In re Judicial Ditch No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920