Legal Opinion
JAM Restaurant, Inc. v. City of Longmont
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 23, 2006No. 04CA1705PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
KIRSHBAUM ** , Justice.
Defendant, City of Longmont, appeals the trial court’s order precluding the amortization, under a municipal zoning ordinance, of the sexually oriented business operated by plaintiff, JAM Restaurant, Inc., and upholding the constitutionality of § 38-1-101(3)(a), C.R.S.2005. JAM cross-appeals the trial court’s determination that the judicial review provisions of the municipal ordinance do not violate the First and Fourteenth Amend ments to the United States Constitution. We affirm.
I
JAM, doing business as Bella’s Cabaret, operates a cabaret in Longmont that features…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- City of Littleton v. Z. J. Gifts D-4, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Town of Telluride v. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Giuliani v. Jefferson County Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2012