Legal Opinion

Patricia Clark v. Kara Bell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 2009No. DA 08-0573PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶ 1 Patricia Clark brought a negligence action to recover damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. A jury in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, rendered a verdict in favor of Defendant Kara Bell. Clark appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a new trial.

¶2 We restate the issues as follows:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err by allowing Defendant Bell to introduce evidence of Clark’s preexisting conditions to challenge Clark’s proof of causation?

¶4 2. Did the District Court manifestly abuse its discretion by denying Clark’s motion for a new…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Giambra v. KelseyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Johnson v. Costco WholesaleMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. MizenkoMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. Van DykenMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Lopez v. JosephsonMontana Supreme Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Styren Farms v. Sherry RoosMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Clark v. BellMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Dimarzio v. Crazy Mountain Construction, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Reese v. StantonMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Horn v. Bull River Country Store Properties, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API