Legal Opinion
People v. Droog
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided January 13, 2009No. Docket 279843PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBandstra, J.
By leave granted, 1 defendant appeals an order of the trial court denying her application, filed under the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside a previous conviction. The trial court’s decision was based solely on a provision of the Michigan Vehicle Code that states that “a court shall not order expunction of any violation reportable to the Secretary of State.” MCL 257.732(22). We conclude that this provision of the Vehicle Code does not apply to prohibit the setting aside of a conviction under the Code of Criminal Procedure. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Defendant had been convicted in 2001…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
- House Speaker v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Wickens v. Oakwood Healthcare SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- General Motors Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. GuthrieMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- People of Michigan v. Douglas Eugene HueyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- People of Michigan v. Douglas Eugene HueyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- People of Michigan v. Marcus McCannMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.