Legal Opinion

Benkert v. Feder

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided March 26, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Suit for Infringement of Trade-Mark.

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

This is a suit for the infringement of a trade-mark “C. Benkert & Son,” used by the plaintiff, doing business under that name, as the successor in interest of a Philadelphia firm of which he was an original member, engaged in the manufacture and sale of boots and shoes, upon which the trade-mark was stamped. There is no doubt in my mind, as to the right of the plaintiff as an original owner in part, and successor in interest to the business to this trade-mark acquired by many years use, (more than a third of a century,) and so generally known as to have almost become a part of the public…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Graham v. PlateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aladdin Mfg. Co. v. Mantle Lamp Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  2. Walter Baker & Co. v. SlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
  3. William Wrigley, Jr. Co. v. L. P. Larson, Jr. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1925
  4. G. & C. Merriam Co. v. OgilvieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
  5. Hennessy v. Wilmerding-Loewe Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API