Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. . Ireland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Coolce, J., at Fall Term, 1912, of Davie.

1Per curiam

This is an action for the recovery of personal property, with the ancillary proceeding of claim and delivery. The property was seized under the requisition, and replevied by defendant upon his giving bond. Plaintiff recovered in the 'action, and the usual judgment was entered for the return of the property, if to be had, and if not, then for its value, which the jury assessed at $400, and damages for deterioration at $70, and fqr detention at $217. This was correct in form (Revisal, sec. 570), and it was for the jury to ascertain the amounts.

1. It was not error to reject the issues tendered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Albert v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Leak v. . CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Deaver v. DeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Coal Co. v. . Ice Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nance v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Nance v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Gray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Gray v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Merchants National Bank v. PackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API