Legal Opinion

Marvin E. Barnett v. Mack H. Alford, Warden and the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1981No. 79-1283PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellant, a state prisoner, sought federal habeas corpus relief contending that his 1965 conviction for murder was invalid because he had been denied the effective assistance of counsel. Specifically, he claimed that privately retained counsel “failed and refused” to perfect a direct appeal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Donald Plaskett v. Warden Ray H. PageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Marsh v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Holder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Barnett v. AlfordDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API