Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Canchola

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 31, 2002No. 13-00-095-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VALDEZ, Chief Justice.

Luis A. Canchóla brought suit against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”), his former employer, for disability discrimination and intentional infliction of emotional distress. According to Wal-Mart, Canchó-la was terminated for violating the company’s policy on sexual harassment. After trial, the jury found in favor of Canchóla and awarded actual damages, attorney’s fees, and costs. The trial court entered judgment on the verdict and awarded prejudgment and postjudgment interest. Wal-Mart appeals this judgment by three issues. We affirm.

Background

Canchóla was…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. CancholaTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Smith v. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. El Paso County, Texas v. Mary Lou Vasquez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2016
  4. Blaire Reid v. SSB Holdings, Inc., D/B/A Protec Laboratory, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2016
  5. Ramirez v. DRC DISTRIBUTORS, LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API