United States v. Ricardo Solorzano-Rivera, AKA Fernando Solorzano-Rivera
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge.
Ricardo Solorzano-Rivera appeals his conviction of illegal reentry into the United States under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the government violated his rights under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 and 3162, and that the district court erred in instructing the jury that the defendant had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence.
We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm the district court. So-lorzano’s arguments concerning the Speedy Trial Act fail. First, not more than 30 days elapsed between his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dock McNeely v. Lou BlanasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Hector Arellano-Rivera,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Scott A. Walker v. Roger Endell, Director, of the Alaska Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Vasquez-LandaverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- State v. SchreinerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- United States v. Alvarez-PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.