Legal Opinion
In re the Adoption of Amendments to N.J.A.C. 6:11-8.4 & N.J.A.C. 6:11-8.5
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 18, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
COLEMAN, J.H., P.J.A.D.
This appeal challenges the New Jersey Department of Education’s regulations allocating responsibility for testing of bilingual teaching candidates’s foreign language proficiency under the Bilingual Education Act (BEA). N.J.S.A. 18A:35-15 et seq. The challenged regulatory amendments shift the proficiency evaluation from the State to the local school district. We now hold that the regulatory change is valid.
*54I
In 1975, Governor Brendan Byrne signed BEA into law. According to the Governor’s signing message, “[t]he new program [was]…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New Jersey Guild of Hearing Aid Dispensers v. LongSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Bergen Pines County Hospital v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Medical Society v. New Jersey Department of Law & Public SafetySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Perez v. Pantasote, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ellicott v. Board of Educ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991