Legal Opinion

Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. Maxus Energy Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 6, 1991No. 524PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

925 F.2d 556

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,777

KIDDER, PEABODY & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MAXUS ENERGY CORPORATION and Maxus Corporate Company,

Defendants-Appellants,

Martin A. Siegel, Ivan F. Boesky and John Does 1-10, Defendants.

Nos. 324, 524, Dockets 90-7487, 90-7657.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 1, 1990.

Decided Feb. 6, 1991.

Chester J. Hinshaw, Dallas, Tex. (Frederick E. Sherman, New York City, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Dallas, Tex., and New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellants Maxus Energy Corp. and Maxus Corporate Co.

Gary P. Naftalis,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Weiss v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF SAG HARBORDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. Weiner v. McKeeferyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  3. Cohen v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  4. Coggins v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  5. Community State Bank v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API