Legal Opinion
Richards v. Giscome
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 31, 1984No. 83 Civ. 1388PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
Pro se plaintiff Justo Richards brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and § 1985(3), alleging that defendants deprived him of various constitutional rights. Defendants Lombardo, Di Mango, Cordero, Giovanniello and Hays have, moved to dismiss the complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the complaint is dismissed in its entirety.
The Complaint
Plaintiff was convicted in the Supreme Court, Kings County, of second degree murder and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree arising out of transactions involving a Panamanian lottery…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Masri v. ThorsenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Richards v. GiscomeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Washington v. SheinbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989