Legal Opinion
Washington v. Sheinberg
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 21, 1989No. 88 CV 900Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Defendant George Sheinberg moves pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for an order dismissing the Complaint. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted.
FACTS
On March 23, 1988, plaintiff, then appearing pro se, filed this Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the defendants conspired to deprive him of due process, equal protection and his right under the eighth amendment to be free of cruel and unusual punishment. Plaintiff demands $250 million in damages and an unconditional release from custody.
On January 27, 1988,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dennis Mack v. Thomas J. Varelas, Sheriff of Nassau County, and John Doe, Deputy Sheriff of Nassau CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.