State v. Yolanda Terry and Teron Savoy
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rabner
As part of a criminal investigation, the State intercepted phone conversations and text messages between a husband and wife, pursuant to a court order. We must decide whether those communications are protected under the marital communications privilege.
Rule 509 of the Rules of Evidence embodies the State’s longstanding marital communications privilege. The rule provides that “[n]o person shall disclose any communication made in confidence between such person and his or her spouse.” N.J.R.E. 509. Underlying the privilege are the well-settled public policies to encourage spouses to share…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Smith v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Casey Piatt v. Police and Firemen's RetirementNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Estate of Lagano v. Bergen Cnty. Prosecutor's OfficeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- Facebook, Inc. v. State of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2023
- J.H. and A.R. v. R & M Tagliareni, LLC (081128)(Hudson County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
- Patricia Gilleran v. Township of Bloomfield(076114)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.