Zaras v. City of Findlay
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGuernsey, J.
This is an appeal on questions of law. Among other things, it appears undisputed in evidence that the plaintiff and the defendant city are the owners of adjoining tracts of land on the east side of South Main Street in Findlay, Ohio; that prior to 1958 there stood on defendant’s land a four-story brick building and on plaintiff’s land a two-story frame building; that the brick south wall of the brick building constituted the north wall of the frame building and was by agreement of the predecessors in title of the respective parties a party wall; that in 1958 the defendant caused the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Co. v. First Congregational ChurchOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Brucks v. WeinigOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by17 opinions
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Lasalle Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Harrigan v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Siferd v. StamborOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
- Wentworth v. Air Line Pilots AssociationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Doran v. Waterbury Parking AuthorityConnecticut Superior Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.