Legal Opinion

Fent v. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 8, 1999No. 92,390Published

1Opinion of the Court

984 P.2d 200 (1999)

1999 OK 64

Jerry R. FENT and Margaret B. Fent, husband and wife, as resident taxpayers and voters of the State of Oklahoma, Petitioners,

v.

OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, a body corporate and politic of the Oklahoma of Oklahoma.

No. 92,390.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 28, 1999.

As Corrected June 28 and July 8, 1999.

Rehearing Denied July 13, 1999.

Russell B. Fister, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma for Petitioner.

Douglas F. Price, Assistant Attorney General, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Thomas J. Hilborne, Jr. of Hilborne & Weidman, Tulsa, Oklahoma; and Gary M. Bush of Fagin, Brown,…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API