Legal Opinion

John Gund Brewing Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1913No. Nos. 3,854, 3,855PublishedCited by 15 opinions

On motion for rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

TRIEBER, District Judge.

In case No. 3,855 we have reached the conclusion, after more careful consideration and examination of the authorities, that we were in error in holding that the indictment was duplicitous because it charged a conspiracy to commit two distinct offenses. The law permits this if there is no duplicity charged in the conspiracy itself, for the conspiracy is entirely distinct from the crimes or unlawful acts which the parties have in view when they enter into the conspiracy. Parties may enter into a conspiracy tp commit the crime of burglary, and, for the purpose of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Anamoose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  2. State v. KennedySupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  3. Hamilton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  2. People v. BradleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. Bryant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
  4. Knauer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  5. Knoell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API