Legal Opinion

United States v. Jason Votrobek

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 13, 2017No. 14-12790PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROYAL, District Judge:

A jury convicted Appellants Jason Vo-trobek and Roland Castellanos of conspiring to distribute drugs, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; conspiring to launder money, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); and substantive charges of money laundering and maintaining a place for unlawful drug distribution. The district court sentenced both to 180 months in confinement, followed by three years of supervised release. Appellants challenge their convictions. After careful review, we AFFIRM.

BACKGROUND

Appellants’ convictions center on their involvement in a “pill mill” business. 1…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Andrew Dollard v. Gary WhisenandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. LambusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Tarresse LeonardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Maikel Vigil GallardoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Michael StapletonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API