Legal Opinion

State v. Hicks

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 28, 1993PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WHITE, Judge.

This is an appeal pursuant to Rule 3(b) of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. Darrin Roosevelt Hicks appeals the sentence imposed by the Sullivan County Criminal Court on his two aggravated robbery convictions. For reasons set forth below, we affirm the trial judge’s decision.

Darrin Roosevelt Hicks and Carolyn Denise Wallen were indicted by the Sullivan County Grand Jury on two charges of aggravated robbery in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated Section 39-13-402. 1 The indictments alleged that the aggravated robberies were committed by “means of a deadly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ButtreyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  2. State v. BennettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  3. State v. WillisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. State v. ZeoliaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  3. State v. NixCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. State v. RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  5. State v. FreemanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API