Legal Opinion
In Re Megan-Racine Associates, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 2, 1996No. 19-10217PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
STEPHEN D. GERLING, Chief Judge.
The within contested matters are before the Court by way of two motions filed by Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (“NIMO”). NIMO’s first motion seeks to terminate (“termination motion”) payments it makes to Megan-Racine Associates, Inc. (“Debtor”) pursuant to New York Public Service Law § 66-c(2) (“6$ payments” or “PSL § 66-c(2)”) for electrical power purchased from Debtor. NIMO filed its termination motion pursuant to this Court’s December 19, 1995 Order shortening notice under Federal Rules of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bank of Marin v. EnglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mann v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Holden v. United States of America (Internal Revenue Service) (In Re Holden)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1999
- In Re Magnesium Corp. of AmericaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In re WeidenbennerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. (In re Megan-Racine Associates, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.