Legal Opinion

Knox v. Lederle Laboratories

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1993No. 92-1341PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Chief Judge.

Appellant Wyeth Laboratories brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (1988) from the denial of its motion for summary judgment on grounds of claim preclusion.1 We affirm.

I

In 1986, Plaintiffs filed in Colorado state district court a product liability action against Wyeth, Lederle Laboratories, and Connaught Laboratories. We will refer to this earlier case as “Knox I.” Plaintiffs claimed that a vaccine manufactured by one of the defendants in Knox I caused severe injuries to the minor Plaintiff, Kenneth Knox.

After discovery, Wyeth moved for summary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. The Evergreens v. NunanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. Perington Wholesale, Inc. v. Burger King Corporation, Davmor Industries, Inc., and Carpenter Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc. v. Nuclear Cardiology Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
  2. Boswell v. Colloid Environmental Technologies Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 2006
  3. (SS) Beberian v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. (SS)(PS) Yeomans v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. Jordan v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API