Knox v. Lederle Laboratories
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Chief Judge.
Appellant Wyeth Laboratories brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (1988) from the denial of its motion for summary judgment on grounds of claim preclusion.1 We affirm.
I
In 1986, Plaintiffs filed in Colorado state district court a product liability action against Wyeth, Lederle Laboratories, and Connaught Laboratories. We will refer to this earlier case as “Knox I.” Plaintiffs claimed that a vaccine manufactured by one of the defendants in Knox I caused severe injuries to the minor Plaintiff, Kenneth Knox.
After discovery, Wyeth moved for summary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The Evergreens v. NunanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Perington Wholesale, Inc. v. Burger King Corporation, Davmor Industries, Inc., and Carpenter Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Siemens Medical Systems, Inc. v. Nuclear Cardiology Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Boswell v. Colloid Environmental Technologies Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 2006
- (SS) Beberian v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (SS)(PS) Yeomans v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Jordan v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.