Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Barham

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 12, 1997No. 94 C 4755PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Albert Bullock, is an inmate currently incarcerated at the Joliet Correctional Center. He alleges that the defendants, three officials of the prison in Joliet, deprived him of due process and violated his Eighth Amendment rights thereby creating a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Mr. Bullock also alleges two state law tort claims, one for conversion and the other for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Mr. Bullock seeks damages as well as injunctive relief for his claims. The defendants move to dismiss the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Junior Ray Duckworth, Cross-Appellants v. Gayle Franzen, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Doe v. Calumet CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Richard Murphy v. Richard E. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Larue v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API