Legal Opinion
Steelman v. Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 5, 2005No. 100,347PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LARRY JOPLIN, Presiding Judge.
T1 Plaintiffs/Appellants Bobby Gene Steelman, Robert D. Wall and Douglas Donald McKenzie (Steelman, Wall, McKenzie or Plaintiffs) seek review of the trial court's order dismissing their claims on motions for summary judgment of Defendant Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System (OPPRS) and individual OPPRS Board of Trustee Member Defendants (Trustees or collectively Defendants). Plaintiffs assert it was error to dismiss the suit because Defendants violated both federal and state statutes, breached contractual rights and violated constitutional…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Nelson v. GeringerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Oklahoma Public Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Department of Central ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Rollings v. Thermodyne Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Baker v. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kannady v. City of KiowaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007