Legal Opinion

Hobkirk v. Portland Baseball Club

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Multnomah: Melvin C. George, Judge. This is a suit by Peter Hobkirk against the Portland National Baseball Club and others, and the Hawthorne Estate, for the foreclosure of a mechanics’ lien. From a decree in favor of plaintiff, the Hawthorne Estate appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is a suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. About January 1, 1903, the defendant the Hawthorne Estate leased to W. H. Lucas, for the use of the defendant the Portland National Baseball Club, a corporation thereafter to be organized, certain property in East Portland for a baseball field. In March the plaintiff entered into a written contract with the defendants Grim and Drake, acting on behalf of Lucas and the proposed corporation, to furnish the material and labor necessary for the construction of a “grand stand, bleachers, and fences on and surrounding” the property, according to certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Livermore v. WrighSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  2. Union Trust Co. v. CasserlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. St. Louis National Stock Yards v. O'ReillyIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Rush v. AbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  5. Avery v. ButlerOregon Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gray v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hammond Hotel & Improvement Co. v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Bethlehem Constr., Inc. v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Spaeth v. BecktellOregon Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API