Legal Opinion

State v. Haynes, Unpublished Decision (2-20-2004)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 2004No. Appeal No. C-020685UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, John Haynes, was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery pursuant to R.C. 2911.01(A)(1) and two counts of robbery pursuant to R.C. 2911.02(A)(2). He was sentenced to serve two consecutive six-year terms of incarceration on the aggravated robbery convictions. The two robberies were merged with the aggravated-robbery convictions for sentencing.

{¶ 2} Haynes presents six assignments of error for review. In his first assignment of error, he states that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress identification evidence. He contends that the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Brewster, Unpublished Decision (6-11-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. Robinson, C-060434 (5-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. Canyon, C-070729 (3-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. Literal, 07ca3207 (1-12-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API