Legal Opinion

United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 10, 1979No. 72-1283PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Concurrence

SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge,

concurring in the result:

I agree with the majority of my brethren that the conviction in this case should be affirmed. I am unable, however, to subscribe to one link in the chain of reasoning they forge in reaching this result. While I applaud the collective action of the full court in now assuring to those accused of crime a level of legal assistance commensurate with the demands of the Sixth Amendment, I deplore the court’s allocation to the accused of a burden of demonstrating that he was jeopardized by established dereliction of duty on the part…

Also in this document: Dissent · Bazelon; Dissent · Bazel-On.

2Cases cited225 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API