United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Concurrence
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge,
concurring in the result:
I agree with the majority of my brethren that the conviction in this case should be affirmed. I am unable, however, to subscribe to one link in the chain of reasoning they forge in reaching this result. While I applaud the collective action of the full court in now assuring to those accused of crime a level of legal assistance commensurate with the demands of the Sixth Amendment, I deplore the court’s allocation to the accused of a burden of demonstrating that he was jeopardized by established dereliction of duty on the part…
Also in this document: Dissent · Bazelon; Dissent · Bazel-On.
2Cases cited225 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979