Legal Opinion

Cravatts v. Klozo Fastener Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, seeks an order in the nature of mandamus to compel a corporation to submit all of its books and records to the examination of petitioner who alleges he is a director and the owner of 20% of the corporation’s stock.

The court at Special Term has granted relief in the full scope in which it is sought. There are, however, factual issues raised in the answer which ought to be examined and resolved before the proceeding is determined on the merits. One such issue arises on the denial of the allegation that petitioner is a director.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schulman v. Louis Dejonge & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cravatts v. Klozo Fastener Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Barry v. MulrainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  3. Cacchioli v. HobermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Foy v. BrennanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API