Legal Opinion

Bott v. Moser

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 26, 1940No. Record No. 2154PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.

This is an action at law, by notice of motion for judgment, instituted by the defendant in error, an architect, against the plaintiff in error, on account of a claim for compensation for his services for drawing plans and specifications for a building to be erected upon a certain lot in the city of Norfolk, the sum claimed being $2,300.00.

The parties will hereafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, which was their relation in the trial court.

There were two trials of the case. In the first, the jury failed to agree upon a verdict. In the second, there was a verdict for the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bebb v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Nave v. McGraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Straus v. BuchmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Davis v. BoscouCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Howard v. UsiakSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  2. Greenhaven Corp. v. Hutchcraft & Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Graulich v. FREDERIC H. BERLOWE & ASSOCIATESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Robsol, Inc. v. GarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Krestow v. WoosterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API