Patton Township v. Monongahela Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 134, Oct. T., 1909, by defendant from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1907, No. 197, on bill in equity in case of Patton Township v. Monongahela Street Railway Company and Consolidated Traction Company. Bill in equity for specific performance of a contract.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 134, Oct. T., 1909, by defendant from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1907, No. 197, on bill in equity in case of Patton Township v. Monongahela Street Railway Company and Consolidated Traction Company. Bill in equity for specific performance of a contract. Miller, J., specially presiding, found the facts and conclusions of law to be as follows: 1. The township of Patton is one of the second class under the laws of the state of Pennsylvania. 2. The Pitcairn & Wilmerding Street Railway Company, duly incorporated under the laws of the state of Pennsylvania, is…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The decree is affirmed on the findings of fact and law by Judge Miller, specially presiding.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Collingdale Boro. v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Borough v. Chambersburg & Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Borough v. Waverly, Sayre & Athens Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- New River Lumber Co. v. Tennessee Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Brown v. Western Maryland Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.