Legal Opinion

State v. Russ

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 7, 1998No. 39703-6-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

This case presents the question of whether our state constitution’s guaranty of the right to testify in one’s own behalf requires a court to conduct a colloquy on the record to establish the accused’s waiver of that right. Also at issue is whether the Persistent Offender Accountability Act (POAA) violates the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

We hold that there is no requirement of a colloquy on the record to protect the state constitutional right to testify in one’s behalf. Moreover, the POAA does not violate the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. James Brown v. Christopher ArtuzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. Tachibana v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DauenhauerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. State v. DauenhauerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. RussCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. State Of Washington v. Charles S. LongshoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State Of Washington v. Juan G. Fregoso UribeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API