Legal Opinion

In re Lacey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original Proceeding in Habeas Corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Dale, C. J.:

This was an original proceeding in habeas *5corpus instituted in this court for the release of Gf. H. Lacey, who is held upon a commitment issued by a United States commissioner, charging the petitioner with the crime of perjury. From the petition and return it appears that on May 18, 1891, the petitioner made an affidavit before the United States land office at Oklahoma City in corroboration of a contest affidavit filed in the said office; that on May 10,1894, he was arrested, charged with the crime of perjury committed in the corroborating affidavit above…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Conley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Rouse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  3. Jarrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. State v. FulkersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Ex Parte WardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API