Stecklein v. Montgomery

*675BISTLINE, Justice,

specially concurring.

I would join in the majority opinion and add the following comments.

I

The dissent does set forth the only finding, or as appears more likely, the only conclusion which was entered on the issue of the existence of an easement. The quoted language is merely the ultimate conclusion that Montgomery had no right-of-way, easement or use of or against Steeklein’s land. But there are no specific findings of the facts upon this issue. Because appellate review is properly directed to ascertaining whether the findings support the conclusions, and whether the…