Legal Opinion

Qui Phuoc Ho and Tong Ho v. MacArthur Ranch, LLC

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided February 7, 2013No. 05-11-00967-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice MURPHY.

Qui Phuoc Ho and Tong Ho appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of MacArthur Ranch, LLC on its fraudulent transfer claims under the Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. See Tex. Bus. & Com.Code Ann. §§ 24.001-.013 (West 2009) (TUFTA). Appellants complain in three issues about the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence, the finding of joint and several liability for the full amount of the debt, and the failure to join Mau Thi Nguyen as a necessary party. We reverse and remand the case for a new trial.

BACKGROUND

Toan Ho and his wife, Nhung Truong,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sargeant v. Al SalehCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Curtis, Dawn v. AGF Spring Creek/Coit II, LTD, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  3. Ponte v. Bustamante ex rel. BustamanteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Abrhim Enshikar v. Ahmad Zaid and Mazen Jumaa, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2020
  5. Enrique N. Ponte, Jr. M.D. and Pediatrix Medical Services, Inc. v. Marcela and Jose Bustamante, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API