Reed v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUGGAN, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of delivery of cocaine weighing more than 28 grams and less than 200 grams. The jury assessed punishment at 20 years confinement, with no fine.
The State observes that patent, unassigned error occurred at the punishment stage of trial, and proposes reformation.
The verdict, judgment, and sentence show that the jury assessed no fine, although the governing statute requires both a penitentiary confinement and a fine. See Tex.Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(d)(1) (Vernon Pamph.1990).
The Health and Safety Code provides a punishment range of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Bogany v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Ex Parte YoungbloodCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Releford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Diaz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mahaffey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
- Jenkins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
- Ibarra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Timothy O'Reilly v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2016
- Land v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.