Talbot v. Ginocchio
California Court of Appeal
• APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff, Delia Talbot, from the negligence of defendant, committed by a servant of defendant in driving a team against the person of said plaintiff. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $350. From this judgment and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial an appeal was in due time taken to this court.
■It is urged that the findings are insufficient to support the judgment in that, as it is claimed, the “finding that ‘the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- House v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Redington v. Pac. Postal Tel. Cable Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Davies v. Oceanic Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- McKernan v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Kienlen v. HoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People Ex Rel. Bradford v. ArcegaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. LaineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919