Legal Opinion
Medina v. New York Elevator Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 11, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated February 18, 1997, as denied as premature that branch of its motion which was to compel the defendant New York Elevator Co., Inc., to indemnify it against the plaintiff’s claims.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
We agree with the Supreme Court that a resolution of the issue of the respondent’s duty to indemnify the appellant must await a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bermudez v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Hayes v. Crane Hogan Structural SystemsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Cichon v. Brista Estates AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bryde v. CVS PharmacyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Brasch v. Yonkers Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Gilbert v. Kingsbrook Jewish CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Taylor v. Bande Real Estate Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Jones v. Rockaway One Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.