Legal Opinion
Hayes v. Crane Hogan Structural Systems
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 12, 1993PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the cross motion by defendant and third-party *979plaintiff Crane Hogan Structural Systems (Crane Hogan) for summary judgment on its third-party complaint seeking contractual indemnification, but for the wrong reason. The unambiguous language of the contract between Crane Hogan, the general contractor, and P.S. Bruckel, Inc. (Bruckel), the subcontractor, required Bruckel to indemnify Crane Hogan for all claims and damages, including attorney…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alsens American Portland Cement Works v. Degnon Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Beacon Terminal Corp. v. Chemprene, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Edwards v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Stimson v. Lapp Insulator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Dewitt v. Pizzagalli Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by17 opinions
- Readco, Inc., R.D.P. Associates, Lan Associates Xii and Antonio Reale v. Marine Midland Bank Eagle Rock Holding, Inc., a New York Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Brown v. U.S. Vanadium Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Adams v. Glass Fab, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Colyer v. K Mart Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Enderlin v. Hebert Industrial Insulation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.