Aktiebolag v. E.J. Co.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ECHOLS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and for Attorney Fees, to which Plaintiff has responded, and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, to which Defendant has responded. Plaintiff filed this action, alleging that (1) Defendants infringed upon its patent rights by replacing the carbide tip of the drill on which it held a patent, and (2) Defendants engaged in unfair competition in marketing the drill. Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment, arguing that the replacement of the carbide tip is merely the repair of an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Wahpeton Canvas Co. v. Frontier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- William E. Martin v. Sgt. Earl KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.