Legal Opinion

C-C

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2006No. ID 3530PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

23 I&N Dec. 899

(BIA 2006) Interim Decision #3530 In re C-C-, Respondent Decided March 23, 2006 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals An alien seeking to reopen removal proceedings based on a claim that the birth of a second child in the United States will result in the alien’s forced sterilization in China cannot establish prima facie eligibility for relief where the evidence submitted with the motion and the relevant country conditions reports do not indicate that Chinese nationals returning to that country with foreign-born…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wei Guang Wang v. Board of Immigration AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Jian Xing Huang v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Jian Lian Guo v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. Tatiana Poradisova, Pavel Poradisov, and Gennadi Poradisov v. Alberto Gonzales, 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. COELHOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1992

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Zhu v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. J-W-SBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
  3. Zheng v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. H-L-H- & Z-Y-ZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2010
  5. He v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API