Legal Opinion
Comstock v. Board of Trustees
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 8, 1937No. Civ. 11162PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J., pro tem.
The parties are agreed that the question presented on this appeal is entirely one of law, and that it is correctly expressed in these words: “Can a probationary teacher of a junior college district be dismissed during the school year simply by giving him notice of the grounds for his dismissal, or must the procedure for dismissing permanent teachers be followed?” They are also agreed that the answer to the question depends upon the interpretation to be placed upon section 5.680 of the School Code of the State of California (Stats, of 1929, appendix; Act 7519, Deering’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blalock v. RidgwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Alexander v. Manton Joint Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Thibaut v. KeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by5 opinions
- Horner v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Titus v. Lawndale School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Pennel v. Pond Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Comstock v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Lunderville v. Emery Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968