Lunderville v. Emery Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying appellant’s petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent school district to reinstate her as a school teacher., and to pay damages. We modify the judgment but affirm denial of the writ.
Appellant was employed by the respondent district'-as a probationary second grade teacher for the school year 1964-1965. On April 14, 1965, at the request of Mr. Higgins D. Bailey, the district superintendent, she attended a meeting of the district board of trustees. At the meeting she was given a letter-notice by Mr. Bailey. It read: “You are hereby notified…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griggs v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Horner v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Titus v. Lawndale School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Tucker v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Sitzman v. City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Balen v. Peralta Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Pasadena Unified School District v. Commission on Professional CompetenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Oakland Unified School District v. OlickerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Pennel v. Pond Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Governing Board of Nicasio School District v. BrennanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.