Legal Opinion

Lunderville v. Emery Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1968No. Civ. 23935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying appellant’s petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent school district to reinstate her as a school teacher., and to pay damages. We modify the judgment but affirm denial of the writ.

Appellant was employed by the respondent district'-as a probationary second grade teacher for the school year 1964-1965. On April 14, 1965, at the request of Mr. Higgins D. Bailey, the district superintendent, she attended a meeting of the district board of trustees. At the meeting she was given a letter-notice by Mr. Bailey. It read: “You are hereby notified…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Horner v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Titus v. Lawndale School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Tucker v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Sitzman v. City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Balen v. Peralta Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Pasadena Unified School District v. Commission on Professional CompetenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Oakland Unified School District v. OlickerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Pennel v. Pond Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Governing Board of Nicasio School District v. BrennanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API