Legal Opinion
Frischman v. Metropolitan Tobacco Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 26, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.
Defendant Metropolitan Tobacco Company, Inc., moves to dismiss the third cause of action for insufficiency. The cause is framed for recovery of treble damages pursuant to section 1433 of the Penal Law. Plaintiff was employed by Metropolitan for twenty-five years. He claims defendants conspired to and did induce breach of union by-laws and constitution and the employment agreement with Metropolitan, by reason of which he has been deprived of employment and additional benefits. It is charged such injury and destruction of rights were done knowingly, intentionally and maliciously.
A cause of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Lurie v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- S. C. Posner Co. v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Vassardakis v. ParishDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Potter v. BierwirthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Photographic Importing & Distributing Corp. v. Elgeet Optical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. HammettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Gerring v. GerberNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Golding v. GoldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957