Legal Opinion
Golding v. Golding
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 21, 1957Published
1Opinion of the CourtRabin, J.
These are companion appeals from certain orders made on motions to dismiss, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice in two similar derivative actions brought by a single stockholder of both corporations.
The first cause of action in each complaint alleges that four of the individual defendants, officers and directors of the corporations, made false and deceitful representations to the plaintiff to induce her to refrain beyond the period allowed by the Statute of Limitations from instituting actions for specified wrongful conduct of those and other defendants. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Beardsley v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Rager v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Friedman v. Roseth Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Friedman v. Roseth CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.