Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Zoller v. Talbert

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1980No. 79-1613PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals erred in holding that appellant lacked standing to maintain this cause.

Pursuant to Section 6.02(C) of the charter of the city of Tiffin, the law director “shall be the prosecuting attorney” for the city. In his prosecutorial capacity, the law director has that degree of discretion necessary to effectively carry out his obligations to the city. One such obligation is to seek proper punishment for those convicted of disobeying the laws of the city and of the state of Ohio.

*330By virtue of this obligation, appellant, in his official capacity, “has a beneficial interest in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. City of Cleveland v. CalandraOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Moraites v. GormanOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State ex rel. Boardwalk Shopping Center, Inc. v. Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Tilford v. CrushOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Carver v. HullOhio Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API