Ketchum Coal Co. v. Christensen
Utah Supreme Court
Mandamus by tbe Ketchum Coal Company against A. H. Christensen, Judge of the District Court of Carbon County, and others. .
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The plaintiff, a corporation, filed its application in due form in this court praying for an alternative writ of mandate against the defendants named in the title. The facts upon which the application aforesaid is based, and which facts were stated in an application to the district court of Carbon County, Utah, as hereinafter made to appear, in substance are as follows :
The plaintiff is a corporation and is the owner of a partially developed coal mine and is endeavoring to mine coal and to place the same on the market for general use. The Pleasant *216Valley Coal Company and the Utah Fuel Company…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte NewmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Merced Mining Co. v. FremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- State ex rel. Bayha v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Raleigh v. First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Crocker v. ConreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cheves v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Ketchum Coal Co. v. District Court of Carbon CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. RuggeriUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- Ketchum Coal Co. v. Pleasant Valley Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
- Taylor National, Inc. v. Jensen Bros. Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.