Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 14, 1986No. CO-85-1426Published

1Opinion of the Court

380 N.W.2d 165 (1986)

STATE of Minnesota, Appellant,

v.

Howard Elmer ANDERSON, Respondent.

No. CO-85-1426.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 14, 1986.

Review Granted March 14, 1986.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, R. Kathleen Morris, Scott Co. Atty., Shakopee, for appellant.

C. Paul Jones, Public Defender, Kathy King, Mark F. Anderson, Asst. Public Defenders, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., and FORSBERG and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Respondent Howard Elmer Anderson was charged with one count of intrafamilial sexual abuse in…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Forsberg; Concurrence · Nierengarten.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. State v. OrtleppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. KlineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. SoukupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. PelovskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API