Legal Opinion

Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. M.O.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 2015No. E062111PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*147Opinion

CODRINGTON, J.

Defendant and appellant M.O. (mother) has unresolved mental health issues that led to the court finding jurisdiction over her 12-year-old daughter, A.O., under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b)1 and removing her from mother’s care. At the six-month review hearing, the court found that returning A.O. to mother would be detrimental to A.O. and that the Riverside County Department of Public Social Services (DPSS) had provided adequate reunification services. At the 12-month review hearing, the court terminated reunification services and ordered that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Beurden Insurance Services v. Customized Worldwide Weather Insurance AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sole Energy Co. v. Petrominerals Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Adoption of Alexander S.California Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. H.W.California Court of Appeal · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. San Bernardino Cnty. Children v. B.F. (In re J.F.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. In re J.F.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. In re N.P. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API