JACKSONVILLE SHERIFF'S OFFICE v. Shacklett
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In this appeal, the Employer challenges the finding of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) that Claimant was entitled to the presumption afforded by section 112.18, Florida Statutes (2007). The Employer alleges the JCC committed two errors: 1) finding Claimant’s “essential hypertension” was of a type covered by the statute; and 2) finding Claimant satisfied the statute’s disability requirement. We affirm as to the first issue because the argument was not preserved. For the reasons explained below, we reverse as to the second issue.
Background
Claimant was employed by the Employer as a law…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bivens v. City of LakelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- City of Mary Esther v. McArtorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rocha v. City of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012