Legal Opinion

State v. Hinton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 8, 2006No. MI-03-0832; A124901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for criminal trespass with a firearm under ORS 164.265, which the state prosecuted as a violation.1 The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court correctly denied defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal made on the ground that the state failed to prove that the private property on which defendant entered and remained was not open to the public. We affirm.

For the most part, the pertinent facts are not disputed. To the extent the evidence conflicts, we view the record in the light most favorable to the state, giving the state the benefit of all…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. MusserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API