Legal Opinion

I.K. v. M.K.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judith J. Gische, J.

Based upon stipulated facts {see stipulation, dated Jan. 8, 2003), the court has been called upon to resolve certain issues arising from the father tape recording telephone conversations between the children and their mother. These tape recordings were made while the children were in Pennsylvania with the father during the period of December 22, 2002 through December 25, 2002. The court has not heard the tapes. The father and the Law Guardian represent, in very general terms, that the tapes contain critical information bearing upon the father’s claim of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sackler v. SacklerNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Able Cycle Engines, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Berk v. BerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. In re Cameron C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Jaeger v. JaegerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The People v. Anthony BadalamentiNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. The People v. Anthony BadalamentiNew York Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API